Ensuring decent housing and strong communities across Scotland
Latest press releases and searchable news archive
Guidance and advice on housing and regeneration topics
A searchable catalogue of our publications
Our divisions and area offices
Ensuring decent housing and strong communities across Scotland




Local Housing Strategies Guidance

Priorities, options and actions

Priorities, Options and Actions

This assessment criteria looked at the objectives contained with the LHS and how relevant these were in the context of the housing needs/market assessment and problem identification.  The assessment considered whether the range of options was appropriate and whether the council’s assessment of options had used appropriate criteria.  Was there shared agreement with partners on the priorities and options selected and was there evidence of imagination and innovation in the priorities/options selected?  The priorities and options should have provided an overall sense of prioritisation, whilst a clear investment framework would allow both partners and providers prioritise their own targets, actions and resources to support the LHS.  The Implementation/Action Plan should have been robust and should support the objectives and priorities/options identified. It should also have set out the lead agency as well as the responsibilities of partner organisations with target timescales/milestones identifies.  Finally, were the expected or desired outcomes and impacts of the objectives, priorities and options clearly identified?

Strengths

In general, those LHS which were assessed as having dealt with this criteria well have shown how the objectives have followed logically from the supporting analysis.  The Implementation/Action Plans were clearly set in the context of the objectives with all key information provided, in particular the identification of target timescales/milestones.

Weaknesses

However, the issues which the assessment process identified as being weaker typically included a lack of prioritisation across actions which in turn will make it difficult for RSLs and other partners to prioritise their own investment to support the LHS.  Often it was not clear what the actual impacts of the actions would be and when these were expected to be achieved.

Examples of Good Practice

Examples of good practice for how Priorities, Options and Actions were dealt with can be found in the following LHS.  For further information on these you should contact the Councils directly:

Western Isles

East Lothian

Renfrewshire Council

The overall gradings achieved from the assessment of the Priorities, Options and Actions critical area were as follows:

Local Authority

Assessment

Aberdeen City Council

Good in parts

Aberdeenshire Council

Good

Angus

Good

Argyll & Bute Council

Good

Clackmannanshire Council

Good

Comhairle Nan Eilean Siar

Very Good

Dumfries & Galloway Council

Good

Dundee City Council

Good in parts

East Ayrshire Council

Good in parts

East Dunbartonshire Council

Good in parts

East Lothian Council

Very Good

East Renfrewshire Council

Good in parts

Edinburgh Council, City

Excellent

Falkirk Council

Good

Fife Council

Good

Glasgow City Council

Good in parts

Highland Council

Good in parts

Inverclyde Council

Good

Midlothian Council

Good in parts

Moray Council

Good

North Ayrshire Council

Generally Weak

North Lanarkshire Council

Good

Orkney Islands Council

Good

Perth & Kinross Council

Very Good

Renfrewshire Council

Very Good

Scottish Borders Council

Good in parts

Shetland Islands Council

Good in parts

South Ayrshire Council

Good in parts

South Lanarkshire Council

Good

Stirling Council

Good

West Dunbartonshire

Good in parts

West Lothian Council

Good in parts